"There are two little planets that I call weenie beans here; Mercury and Mars."-Vicki Hanson

Skip ahead to 7:45.

It's always a good sign when a speaker opens up with something very very basic. That usually means something eschewed is about to get called into question! In this case the spoiler is the premise that the lithosphere is not an atmospheric layer of a convecting planet. From Convections point of view, it is.

This is more of a panel than a lecture, it involves a lot... of corny humor. They might be stoned, but are probably nerds doing public speaking in a room full of people they know. There aren't a lot of slides, but there are a fair number of quotes to timestamp by. It's a very good proof of what the actual Venus scientists are thinking and doing. These are they.

•  Hansen actually says a lot of noteworthy bits. Like she's been teaching undergrads via short blurbs for years and years. "What was Earth like before plate tectonics? We would like to know." At 15:00. That sums up her talk nicely.
• Slide at 16:58, this slide illustrates the point of view shift, Venus crust is just a conductor between two convective forces therefore its just like an air-filter, collecting chemistry between the two convective forces. A very ergonomic point of view within the limitations of what actual probes can actually do.
• At 18:00, "Most of the planet sits at the same elevation." A sound bite that is more on point than the slide it comes with. Her style is a very interesting, very auditory way to teach. I'm personally bad at auditory learning.
• 22:10 "A lot of the Soviet missions to Venus were great successes while the missions to Mars were failures, and the converse was true for the US,[so from early on we were building on...'the history']." From a different panelist.
• 29:14 "If you cooked off everything on the Earth, everything on the surface gets put into that atmosphere."
• 31:50"[Venus had a resurfacing event] and when it did this it churned up a lot of materiel into the atmosphere."
• 32:50. Note that the new term "Tessera" meaning the continent-like highlands of Venus, has now entered the vernacular. "We think those are the ancient rocks on Venus, that will help us tell about climate." He's talking about granite. It's buoyant among basalt, and we do not know how so much of it appeared so quickly in the crust of Earth. Any granite detection will be a huge deal. Better than Aliens.
• 36:16 "Right now there is some debate as to whether Venus is in a stagnant-lid, or mobile lid regime."
• 50:33 "What is the actual chemistry of a lava on the surface?" Note that this question is disclaimed, as in the coming probes can't help much. But this is what they are fighting over behind the scenes.

The Phosphine thing isn't in this video at all and there are reasons for that. SOFIA didn't see any, so the topic is in a state of 'it must be episodic, or localized or not at all.' which is directly related to the "actual chemistry of lava." You see why that is going to be the long-term Venus conundrum. The big TLDR of this video is that the word "Tessera" is going to be used a lot more from now on.

 "If you look at this sort of picture that I drew."-Nick Borsato

Skip ahead to 4:50.

I like this guy; he speaks to my level. Belt'n out facts that might be obvious if I could be bothered to infer things.

I have to admit I don't have near the same interest in exoplanets as in planetary science, but I would be interested in any planetary science of exoplanets. That's what this video delivers. It's quite a bit more satisfying than it looks.

• I feel like the slide at 8:50 should be a meme.
• At 10:58, he's really good at selling his samples.
• The theme of the remaining talk is to categorically list all the measurable information that can conclude something. So it's a good reference. 
• Summary at 43:25.

This talk seems to have ulterior motives, homeboy may be applying for a grant. Nobody ad-libs this much salesmanship; but they do talk extemporaneous this way. Best wishes if he is, good talk regardless.